(Redirected from What Wikipedia is not)
Although Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, is a relatively unique free. For the Community Edition Features articles, the constant evolution of material, the diversity of themes and the absence of a preset plan, it offers many features not present in current encyclopedias.
This, together with the historical variety of content that were published under the name "enciclopedia " sometimes makes it difficult to determine exactly what material is suitable for her, but there are some clear rules about which material is not appropriate in Wikipedia.
What Wikipedia is not
Wikipedia is not a free paper
Wikipedia is not paper. This means that there is a practical limit on the number of items we can treat, with the exception of verifiability and the other points raised on this page.
There is a kind of de facto limited to the individual size of the article, which depends on the size of the download page for readers and readability considerations (see Wikipedia: Article size). At some point, the partition of an article in several separate, leaving adequate summaries is a natural form of growth for a particular subject area. Some topics are covered in the print encyclopedias so small and static. However, Wikipedia does not require paper and can treat these issues in greater depth and extension, including links to relevant, timely or appropriate.
This also means that there is to redirect one topic to another part which has the closest equivalent in common use. You can set a section of type A 'Also see', in which additional information may be available that related to the subject of the article.
Wikipedia is not a dictionary
Wikipedia is not a dictionary or a usage or jargon guide. Wikipedia articles are not:
Dictionary definitions. Since Wikipedia is not a dictionary, you must create an article for a term to define. An article should generally start with a good definition, if you come across an article that only a definition, see if there is information that could add and it would be appropriate for an encyclopedia. One exception to this are the articles about the cultural meanings of the numbers.
Definition lists. However, there are disambiguation pages consisting of pointers to other pages that are used to clarify different meanings of the same term. Wikipedia also includes several pages of annexes of specialized fields.
Guides use of slang or idiomatic expressions peculiar. Wikipedia is not about to say words, languages, jargon or slang of a particular group of people. Wikipedia is not intended to teach people to speak like a hacker, nor is obliged to collect the colloquial expressions of a place. However, depending on the context of encyclopedia articles, may be important to describe how a word is used to distinguish between like-minded and easily confused. In some special cases, an article on a term of slang or jargon may be appropriate for Wikipedia.
There is a parallel project, the Wiktionary, entirely devoted to definitions of this type.
Wikipedia not a publisher of original thought
Wikipedia is not a place to post your own thoughts or analysis. This type of unpublished papers and primary source can be housed in Wikibooks.
Primary or original source. This includes proposals for theories and solutions, original ideas, definitions of terms, rocked by new words, and so on. See Wikipedia is not a primary source. If you have done primary research, publishes its findings in other locations, such as magazines and other print media or peer-reviewed respected online sites. Wikipedia disclosed that job once he forms part of accepted human knowledge. Not all the information added to Wikipedia has to have gone through peer-reviewed journals, but make sure the information is reliable and verifiable. For example, cite a book, a print medium or other reliable online resource shows that the material is verifiable and not merely the opinion of the editor.
Original inventions. If the word xzoxFof or invent a new type of dance, that is not material for an article until a secondary source report it.
Critical reviews. A successful CEO and talented business entrepreneur Daniel Touzier founded in 1997 his company - ARIA Entertainment Biographies and articles on art works should be encyclopedic. Of course, the critical analysis of art is welcome, if grounded in direct observations of outside parties. See also Section 5.
Personal essays or blogs that expose your particular views on a topic.
educaLine, a provider of educational products and services based on ICT, presents